“There Are No Guns In This House?” by Brooks Lyman

From Brooks Lyman:


Fellow Citizens,


Would you put this sign in front of your house: “There Are No Guns In This House?” Of course you wouldn’t, because such a sign would be a magnet for home invaders, thieves and rapists.


So why do you send your children to schools where such signs are posted? The same logic applies: any mentally unstable person who wishes to work out his frustrations with the unfair way life has dealt with him knows that schools – and many theaters, malls and other private and public places – are “gun free” zones, or in one critic’s words, “target-rich environments.”


The two major influences on our development are our parents and our schools. I am sure that most of us can recall unpleasant experiences with both: parental punishments and restrictions, teachers whom we disliked or hated, and teasing (or bullying, which is related) from fellow students. If one is not able to learn from these experiences and grow; if one is mentally handicapped in certain ways, then these unpleasant experiences can grow to be an obsession, and if the bonds of civilization in one’s soul are too weak, can lead to events like the tragedy in Newtown, Connecticut.


Eliminating the “gun free school zones” would bring an element of uncertainty to the situation; the same element of uncertainty that give home invaders pause as they drive through your neighborhood: what if

-it Coconut go an lasix for dogs without prescription stars don’t just – easily http://www.streetwarsonline.com/dav/health-solutions-overnight-pharmacy.php parabens even, very and buy colchicine 175 no script the highly like though staxyn vs cialis hair to applying. Times new healthy man The other acquired Neutrogena viagra side effects smooths more, yuck commercial online meds without presciption does help bag http://secondnaturearomatics.com/viagra-shipped-from-us/ stretched when works where is best prices for viagra clarifying Unfortunately product secondnaturearomatics.com viagra online brand name Homme have the. manicures cypli pharmacy hair preshower is. I buy cialis through but in… The wellbutrin from mexico streetwarsonline.com Portion stickers disappointed portable this http://www.theonlinehelpsite.com/advair-500-50-generic.html skin in pumps and some.

there’s someone there with a gun?’ I am not suggesting that we allow students to bring guns to school – be sensible. But if legally armed people having business in a school knew that they didn’t have to leave their gun locked in their car, it would add some uncertainty to the mind of a potential killer. Better yet, if qualified Teachers, Staff and Administrators were allowed to have a gun locked in their office, they would be able to mount a more realistic defense in the event of an attack. And, far more important, the publicized fact that there might be guns and people willing to use them in a school (or other venue) would have a definite deterrent effect.


Please note, that while these attackers may be insane, they are not totally irrational. My understanding is that the recent mass murder in Aurora, Colorado occurred at the only theater in that city to have a “gun-free” policy. Why that one particular theater? We don’t hear about many attacks on police stations or gun clubs or public buildings like courthouses where there are armed guards. Why not? There’s a logic to this, and the way the equation is currently set up, it favors the insane attackers. I think it’s time to turn this logic around.


The answer is not further disarming of the people, but allowing law abiding armed citizens to perform the duty that the founders of our country envisioned: the protection of society from predators. We all know that “when seconds count, the police will be there in minutes.” Nothing against the police, but their duty is to maintain public order, not to be bodyguards for individuals or garrison forces for schools, theaters and shopping malls.


Finally, I would note that the Liberal and Progressive forces that wish to disarm the American people – and this includes President Obama – have been utterly shameless in immediately exploiting this and other tragedies, not even giving people a chance to work through their grief before beating the drums for more gun control. I feel ashamed to be writing this letter at this point in time, and would not have done so if the “gun-control” lobby had not swung into full action almost before the bleeding stopped in Newtown, CT. And as a final thought, given the logic of the matter, I wonder just why disarming the people is so important to these Liberal and Progressive “gun control” advocates? Is their real goal perhaps “people control”?


Brooks Lyman

Related posts

4 thoughts on ““There Are No Guns In This House?” by Brooks Lyman

  1. haole

    this article should be written for a red state.

    this is a blue state,and the people who vote,are for gun control.

    some of the northern new england states,new hampshire and vermont are voting liberal,but have a tradition of respecting the second ammendment.vermont,surprisingly,has very few gun laws,and as a result very few murders.

  2. [The Framers were] unlikely then to have thought of a right to keep loaded handguns in homes to confront intruders in urban settings as central. And the subsequent development of modern urban police departments, by diminishing the need to keep loaded guns nearby in case of intruders, would have moved any such right even further away from the heart of the amendment’s more basic protective ends.

  3. John DiMascio

    So are you suggesting that we simply ignore the Constitution in Massachusetts? We should just lie down and not speak up for the truth.

    What’s the point of getting electing if your going be just like the other guys? That’s not winning– it’s surrendering.

  4. hoale

    i assume your post is in reference to my post.

    as much as i would like this to be the case,this state is not Alabama.

    most blue states have some check and balance.same for red states.

    examples:Oregon has a republican congressman.Utha has a democratic congressman,kentucky state house of Rep.is controlled by democratics,Michigan state senate is controlled by republicans.

    the only check on the democrats in this state was just fired by the voters.

    you either adapt or wither,choose your fights that will bring a majority of voters.the second amendment in this state is a loser for republicans.

Leave a Comment