It’s clear, we can’t keep nominating LIBERAL “REPUBLICANS” who pretend to be “Moderates”.
Let’s recap the REPUBLICAN LOSERS:
‘MODERATE‘ John McCain – presidential loser, who is not even a member of the senate leadership
‘MODERATE‘ Mitt Romney – ditto
‘MODERATE‘ Scott Brown – congress…..spent all his time pandering to Democrats and liberals, and sticking up the middle finger to any conservatives (sorry, it’s true, just ask a conservative)
‘MODERATE‘ (O.K., radical social liberal) Richard Tisei congress (nice guy, don’t get me started),
‘MODERATE‘ Kerry Healey, governor…the rich lady who has lost every election she ever ran for, except ‘National State Committeewoman’ of which she garnered the obscure position via the LIBERAL vote on the Republican State Committee
‘MODERATE‘ Charlie Baker, governor, who made it a point to march in a gay pride parade and tell everyone he’s further left on the social issues than Barry Hussein Obama.
‘MODERATE‘ fill in the blank,……. the list is long.
This time, we have
‘MODERATE‘ GOMEZ (DONATED TO OBAMA and other RADICAL LIBERALS)
‘MODERATE‘ WINSLOW (DONATED to MANY MANY MANY LIBERAL AND ULTRA-RADICAL LIBERAL POLITICIANS, and is a “SOCIAL EXTREMIST CARRYING THE BANNER INTO BATTLE FOR GAY MARRIAGE AND ABORTION FUNDING BY TAXPAYERS”.
we have MIKE SULLIVAN.
Is he 100% conservative? No. Close, but not 100%.
(Are there some SERIOUS issues with the liberal extremists he has on his campaign staff? Yes.)
Is he 100% better than the other two Republicans? YES.
He’s the best damn Republican candidate to run a campaign in Massachusetts in the past two decades.
MESSAGE TO LIBERAL REPUBLICANS: How about dropping your litmus test and actually allowing a fairly conservative Republican into your “BIG TENT?”
I’m voting on Tues. for Mike Sullivan. I hope you do too.